Predictive factors for the efficacy of myofascial infiltration in chronic cervicalgia: implications for technique indication criteria

Published: February 19, 2025
Abstract Views: 16
PDF: 9
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Chronic cervicalgia is a widespread condition that severely impacts patients' quality of life and often presents with a myofascial pain component, characterized by the presence of trigger points (MTrPs). In clinical practice, myofascial trigger point infiltration with local anesthetics and corticosteroids has been used extensively as an interventional treatment to alleviate pain. However, not all patients experience the same level of improvement, which has prompted research into the identification of predictive factors for treatment success. This prospective study investigates the clinical and demographic predictors of positive outcomes following myofascial trigger point infiltrations in patients with chronic cervicalgia. Seventy-four patients were recruited from a chronic pain management unit and underwent three ultrasound-guided infiltrations of lidocaine and corticosteroids into active MTrPs over a six-week period. Pain intensity, quality of life, and physical function were measured at baseline and four weeks after the final infiltration using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), SF-36 Health Survey, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). Results showed that 75.7% of patients reported significant improvement (PGI-I scores of 1-3) at four weeks post-treatment. Key predictors of positive outcomes included age greater than 50 years, a baseline VAS score of 5 or lower, and higher scores in the emotional role subscale of the SF-36. Conversely, younger age (<50 years), higher baseline pain intensity, and lower pressure pain thresholds (algometry scores <2500 g/cm²) were associated with poorer outcomes. These findings suggest that clinicians should consider patient age, baseline pain levels, and emotional well-being when selecting candidates for myofascial infiltrations to optimize treatment outcomes.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
1. Bogduk N. The anatomy and pathophysiology of neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2003;14:455-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-9651(03)00041-X
2. Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. Vol. 1. Upper half of body. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
3. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Dommerholt J. Myofascial trigger points: peripheral or central phenomenon? Curr Pain Headache Rep 2014;18:356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-013-0395-2
4. Borg-Stein J, Simons DG. Focused review: myofascial pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:S40-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.32155
5. Gerwin RD. A review of myofascial pain and fibromyalgia--factors that promote their persistence. Acupunct Med 2005;23:121-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/aim.23.3.121
6. Tough EA, White AR, Richards SH, Campbell JL. Variability of criteria used to diagnose myofascial trigger point pain syndrome--evidence from a review of the literature. Clin J Pain 2007;23:278-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31802fda7c
7. Alonso-Blanco C, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Morales-Cabrera JM, et al. Multiple active myofascial trigger points and pressure pain sensitivity maps in the temporalis muscle are related to the clinical parameters of chronic tension-type headache. Pain Med 2011;12:341-51.
8. Hong CZ. Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:256-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199407000-00006
9. Gerwin RD, Shannon S, Hong CZ, et al. Interrater reliability in myofascial trigger point examination. Pain 1997;69:65-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03248-4
10. Travell JG, Simons DG. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. Vol. 2. The lower extremities. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins; 1992.
11. Lugo LH, García HI, Rogers HL, Plata JA. Treatment of myofascial pain syndrome with lidocaine injection and physical therapy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016;17:94-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0949-3
12. Ay S, Evcik D, Tur BS. Comparison of injection methods in myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29:19-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1307-8
13. MacDermid JC. An introduction to evidence-based practice for hand therapists. J Hand Ther 2004;17:105-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.001
14. Kietrys DM, Palombaro KM, Azzaretto E, et al. Effectiveness of dry needling for upper-quarter myofascial pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013;43:620-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2013.4668

How to Cite

1.
Groizard Botella MJ, Buriticá Aguirre AM, Palumbo M, Matute Crespo M, Vilà Justribó FJ, Montero Matamala A. Predictive factors for the efficacy of myofascial infiltration in chronic cervicalgia: implications for technique indication criteria. Adv Health Res [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 19 [cited 2025 Feb. 23];2. Available from: https://www.ahr-journal.org/site/article/view/32